nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Izaac <izaac () setec org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:28:43 -0500
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:47:32PM +0100, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote:
certain large corporations that have run out of RFC1918, etc. space
At what level of incompetence must an organization operate to squander roughly 70,000 /24 networks? Or to do so and then decide, "You know what we really need to do? Let's stomp on someone else's address space instead of deploying IPv6 a decade late. "And not just anyone's -- the US Military's! Because there's no possible future in which an emergency might arise and see a need for this global network built for resiliency to carry defense related traffic." -- . ___ ___ . . ___ . \ / |\ |\ \ . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Martin (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bryan Fields (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Eric Kuhnke (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space borg (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Clayton Zekelman (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Izaac (Jan 22)