nanog mailing list archives
Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping
From: Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:33:42 +0000
I was an Erols customer during that time. What's the story? ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+rod.beck=unitedcablecompany.com () nanog org> on behalf of William Herrin <bill () herrin us> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 1:01 AM To: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com> Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:35 AM Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com> wrote:
I'm going a bit deeper into the study of Peering Relationships... And one of the possibilities that I'm trying to understand better on the Peering Relationships on the Internet been considered dumping(economy). The matter here is more on the economic and commercial aspects than on the technical side.
Hi Douglas, I'm not aware of any examples of Dumping (in the economics sense) involving backbone BGP peering. Usually the problem is collusive exclusion. If you want to cast a wider net, Erols Internet of the 1990s offers an interesting case study in driving competition out with extended below-cost pricing. But this was dialup and DSL service, not backbone peering. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Douglas Fischer (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Rod Beck (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Nuno Vieira via NANOG (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Rod Beck (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Douglas Fischer (Mar 16)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Niels Bakker (Mar 16)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Matthew Petach (Mar 16)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Rod Beck (Mar 15)
- Re: SFI/SBI/Transit - Dumping Rod Beck (Mar 15)