nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 01:15:52 +1100
On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 08:05 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
Usually efforts like this suck, but whatever WISPA did this year with the migration from a mailman system to an integrated forum\mailing list solution seems to work really well. It's not exactly like mailman, but it works very well.
Discourse?!? It's a great "forum" by some accounts, but it is one of the most seriously crappy mailing lists I have ever been subjected to. Without a word of exaggeration, it operates as if the developers had never seen a working mailing list. Quoting, signatures, sender addresses, reply-to addresses, HTTP vs text, archiving, threading, configuration - you name it, they screwed it up. Not in minor ways either. I hope all the above is wrong. My experience is about a year old. Maybe the software has been improved. At very least, make sure that your beta testers include a proper proportion of email-only users, and then listen to them. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer GPG fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170 Old fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Popovitch via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Edward McNair (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Alfie Pates (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: [External] Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Levine (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Michael Hallgren (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joe Provo (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? bzs (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 19)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 20)