nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?
From: Stefan Funke <stefan () stadtaffe eu>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 06:21:08 +0100
On 05/03/2021 01:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
First, take a look at this: https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 <https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894> Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools): https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 <https://bgp.he.net/AS18894> https://stat.ripe.net/18894 <https://stat.ripe.net/18894>The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no correlation with reality in global v4/v6 BGP tables.It is also noteworthy that I have inquired with a number of persons I know who are active in network engineering in NYC, and nobody has ever encountered this company.
Hi Nanog!If you stumble across such things, drop us a note at support () peeringdb com and we will take a look at it.
-Stefan
Current thread:
- Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Eric Kuhnke (Mar 04)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Tom Beecher (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Stefan Funke (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? Justin Wilson (Lists) (Mar 05)
- Re: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries? James Breeden (Mar 08)