Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

["james.cutler () consultant com" <james.cutler () consultant com>]

> On Mar 24, 2021, at 11:43 AM, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/24/21 17:31, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> >  Real time can be helpful when needed, but when it is not, it feels to me like it becomes significant noise, and 
> > often times impossible to track what conversations are when (and when they were.).
>
> I agree with this when it comes to messaging apps.
>
> I made the conscious decision not to be beholden to these messaging apps. I'll get to it, when I get to it.
>
> Time is very precious; if you feel something is urgent, call. Sending me a text and getting cross because I didn't 
> reply in 60 seconds just falls on deaf ears. As you say, time is our main asset.
>
> Not to sound aloof, but unless it's time-sensitive and I happen to be on app when the message comes in, I'll 
> generally reply after a day, sometimes a week. I've setup my phones not to illuminate, vibrate or chime when messages 
> or other such things come in. Phone calls being the only exception.
>
> It has allowed me to slow down, and make better use of my limited time (mostly drinking wine, but you get the idea).
>
> Which is why, for me, replicas of a NOG on Telegram or Signal just doesn't work - it's too real-time for me. I check 
> e-mail more regularly (on my laptop) than I check my phones.
>
> Mark.
An extension of Mark’s comments could include actually using a voice call if there really is an immediate need — voice 
message recording is built-in to many smart phones, wireless handsets, and VoIP services.