nanog mailing list archives

Re: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs


From: Adam Thompson <athompson () merlin mb ca>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 21:03:28 +0000

EXOS is a perfectly good OS that bears absolutely no resemblance to anything else you've ever used in your career.  If 
you start from scratch without training courses, you're looking at wasting 6 months (maybe more) just learning the OS 
well enough to figure out how to configure your desired deployment.  Then you get to the usual month or so of 
fine-tuning required that every product needs.

Given how many companies will pay for training nowadays, it's a relevant concern IMHO.

Now that I'm used to EXOS, I like it.  But I would never recommend an EXOS newbie start a project with a product that 
runs EXOS, without some jump-start training.  It really is/was that painful.  It's like giving a 100% Windows admin a 
UNIX box to get the new service running on, with no training.  (Or vice-versa.)

NOTE: Extreme's goal (supposedly targeting 2021) was to ship one common hardware platform that could run any of their 3 
OSes.  I don't know if they're achieved it, but generally speaking, for any EXOS box, there's two more products, one 
running the Nortel/Avaya OS and one IronWare (Foundry/Broadcom), both of which are fairly "normal".

-Adam

Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[1593169877849]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
athompson () merlin mb ca<mailto:athompson () merlin mb ca>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>

________________________________
From: Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>
Sent: May 31, 2021 15:30
To: Adam Thompson <athompson () merlin mb ca>
Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs

Adam.

When you say "Beware using any EXOS-based product (anything that starts with "X") unless you're already familiar with 
EXOS!" Are you saying stay away from this line completely, or what do you mean by this statement. I have heard good 
things about Extreme for deploying service provider G.8032 and MPLS functions.

Yes, I was aware of https://www.mef.net/certify/technology-registry/ and have gone through pretty much every vendor 
looking at their solutions. Extreme for example is not listed at all, so I guess they didn't want to pay those fees! 
There are quite a few Chinese vendors we can't use.


On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:44 PM Adam Thompson <athompson () merlin mb ca<mailto:athompson () merlin mb ca>> wrote:
Extreme has excellent MEF implementations.  I've never used their MPLS implementations, but it's definitely there on, I 
think, all their products.  I only have the X620 model in my network, which may or may not work for you.  Beware using 
any EXOS-based product (anything that starts with "X") unless you're already familiar with EXOS!  I cannot emphasise 
this enough!
Extreme's other product lines come from Nortel/Avaya and Broadcom heritage, and also have good MEF implementations (and 
more-or-less-sane OSes).  They have MPLS support, but again, no experience with it.
I can't give much advice on pricing as I get both edu & gov discounts, but they are competitive with Arista and Cisco 
when we go to RFP.

Also, Juniper's MX (and maybe PTX?) families support MEF if that's a hard requirement.  I know some but not all EX 
switches have had both MEF and MPLS, too.  Beware many EX models have pretty minimalist MPLS implementations (e.g. no 
VPLS).  Agreed on their pricing, though, which is why I don't have any 🙂.  But for 4x10G the MX104 is a very nice box - 
if you can afford it.

Lastly, have you seen https://www.mef.net/certify/technology-registry/ ?

-Adam


Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
[1593169877849]
100 - 135 Innovation Drive
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
athompson () merlin mb ca<mailto:athompson () merlin mb ca>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>

________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+athompson=merlin.mb.ca () nanog org<mailto:merlin.mb.ca () nanog org>> on behalf of Colton 
Conor <colton.conor () gmail com<mailto:colton.conor () gmail com>>
Sent: May 26, 2021 11:39
To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org>>
Subject: MPLS/MEF Switches and NIDs

For MPLS and MEF switches, I know Juniper, Cisco, and Nokia are commonly talked about on this list. However, I was 
wondering if anyone has evaluated other brands? We are not interested in looking at chinese based vendors, so ZTE and 
Huawei are not an option. Anyone else worth looking into?

We have used Juniper's ACX line primarily, but there is a big gap in their product line. The ACX2200 has only two 10G 
ports. The next jump up from there is the ACX710 with 24 10G ports. They have nothing in between that has 4-12 10G 
ports. Not to mention, Juniper is very proud price wise. We are looking for cost efficient 10G NIDs with at least 4 10G 
ports on them and aggregation boxes with at least 12 10G ports on them with 25g/100G uplinks.

Ciena seems to have multiple options available with Segment Routing, MPLS, and streaming telemetry support. I am 
probably most interested in what Ciena has to offer. Has anyone deployed the 3000 or 5000 product line of Ciena? How 
does it compare to Juniper? The Ciena 3924 is sub $1000 for example, and has 4 10G ports on it.

Adva has quite a few options as well, but I don't think their routing stack is as strong as Ciena's.

Tejas was an unknown player to me, but they seem to have a couple of options that fit the bill. Price wise, I have 
heard the run circles around everyone.

RAD has some options, but their pricing looks much higher than Ciena.

Accedian looked interesting, but it seems they don't make aggregation switches, only NIDs.

ECI Telecom / Ribbon seems to have some options, but I have not talked to them.

What does Nokia and Cisco have in this space, and price wise is it going to compare to these less known vendors?








Current thread: