nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper hardware recommendation
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 22:50:48 +0200
lør. 8. maj 2021 09.16 skrev Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>:
I just wish Juniper could make an MX204-lite, one with more 10Gbps port density, e.t.c.
Maybe they did in the ACX710? Does most things except full routing table. We use mx204 to carry the full tables and handle ip transit. And ACX5448 + ACX710 with evpn, vpls, l3vpn and internal Internet tables. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation, (continued)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Ryan Hamel (May 07)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Javier Gutierrez Guerra (May 07)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Tony Wicks (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Stephen M (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Javier Gutierrez Guerra (May 07)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Ryan Hamel (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mann, Jason via NANOG (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Alain Hebert (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Marco Paesani (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 09)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Adam Thompson (May 14)