nanog mailing list archives
Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:38:25 +0200
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 13:32, Tony Wicks <tony () wicks co nz> wrote:
I mean a router without ASIC based forwarding like a Juniper MX or Nokia 7750. The advantage of the 1k is you don't need a services card for cgnat, but the large disadvantage is everything passes through the ESP processor and this often leads to disappointing results under load.
I think ASR1k NPU perfect analog for Juniper MX Trio or Nokia 7750 FP, I think these all fall in very common description of an NPU. We could dive deep and explain why 7750 and MX are vastly different, in decision of doing many small or few large cores, but ultimately they easily fall under NPU definition. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre (Nov 26)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Fiona Weber via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tassos (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre (Nov 28)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tassos (Nov 27)