nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public


From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:30:42 -0400

This is actually worse than our collective progress on replacing v4 to
date.

-jim

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who
noticed?

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html

That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's
just
me.  So many things are just me.

[ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]

Cheers,
-- jra

--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647
1274


Current thread: