nanog mailing list archives
Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:28:14 -0700
A partial table with no default is perfectly fine for a peering router. As long as your peering router knows how to get to your prefixes and those of your customers, as well as the prefixes of the networks you peer with, you're good to go.
in fact, this seems to be the modern conservative style for some years. i sometimes wonder if it is worth the config pain. randy
Current thread:
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Adam Thompson (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Saku Ytti (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Mark Tinka (Oct 01)
- Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more Adam Thompson (Oct 01)