nanog mailing list archives

Re: Better description of what happened


From: PJ Capelli via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:50:02 +0000

I probably still have my US Robotics 14.4 in the basement, but it's been awhile since I've had access to a POTS line it 
would work on ... :)

pj capelli
pjcapelli () pm me

"Never to get lost, is not living" - Rebecca Solnit

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Wednesday, October 6th, 2021 at 10:41 AM, Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com> wrote:

On 10/5/21 5:51 AM, scott wrote:


On 10/5/21 8:39 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:


This bit posted by Randy might get lost in the other thread, but it appears that their DNS withdraws BGP routes 
for prefixes that they can't reach or are flaky it seems. Apparently that goes for the prefixes that the name 
servers are on too. This caused internal outages too as it seems they use their front facing DNS just like 
everybody else.


Sounds like they might consider having at least one split horizon server internally. Lots of fodder here.


even a POTS line connected to a modem connected to a serial port on a workstation in the data enter so that you can 
talk to whatever you need to talk to.  I would go so far as to have other outgoing serial connections to routers from 
that workstation. It's ugly, but it provides remote out of band disaster management.  Just sayin'


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Move fast; break things? :)


scott


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: