nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:03:02 +0200
You're confusing things. The fact that cellular providers, actually cellular equipment vendors, do not implement DHCPv6-PD, doesn't mean that you can't use DHCPv6-PD for assigning IPv6 prefixes using 464XLAT in broadband. See RFC8585 and RFC8683. El 6/9/21 14:56, "NANOG en nombre de Bjørn Mork" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en nombre de bjorn () mork no> escribió: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> writes: > All this is resolved using IPv6-only and IPv4aaS, the same way as > cellular providers are doing with 464XLAT. Sure, there are a gazillion ways to provde edge access to both IPv4 and IPv6. You can pick anyone you like. But the extra layers still do not come for free. And cellular providers give you a single /64. Not even useful as IPv6 access for anything larger than a single handset. Extending that /64 to something you can use is non-trivial. How many providers have actually done that? And how many end users cared? Bjørn ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 06)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)