nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:40:10 +0200
Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> writes:
This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date, we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty big fire under those laggards. Think about it… Amazon doesn’t want to lose access to Comcast, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, and/or AT&T eyeballs any more than those ISPs want to deal with the call center consequences if they turn off IPv4 before those content providers are ready.
By all means, let's just escalate the peering wars between eyeball networks and content providers. That will solve all our problems. Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brandon Butterworth (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John R. Levine (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 17)