nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:32:25 -0300
Are you ready for that, or should we wait another 80 years with dual stack and gigantic stateful NATs?
That's what this network is going to do: https://www.aa.net.uk/etc/news/ipv6-end-of-trial/ There is something odd about the day this was published, though. Rubens
Current thread:
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Rubens Kuhl (Apr 01)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 02)
- RE: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Re: V6 still not supported Rubens Kuhl (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Apr 02)