nanog mailing list archives
Re: FEC AO 2022-14
From: Anne Mitchell <amitchell () isipp com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:40:30 -0600
On Aug 1, 2022, at 7:38 PM, Michael Rathbun <mdr () tesp com> wrote: The incremental cost of unwanted postal mail deposited in a recycling bin in most US municipalities is 0.0000% of the monthly charge. The sender is, however, paying USPS for (however degraded) delivery. This works for me.
Just to clarify, this is specifically about *campaign-related* USPS mail. Because Congress has enjoyed franking privileges (meaning they get to send out USPS mail that is related to their official congressional business at no cost to the congressperson, and instead on the taxpayer's dime) for, well, ever. -- Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Counsel Emeritus, eMail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
Current thread:
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 Michael Rathbun (Aug 01)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 sronan (Aug 01)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 William Allen Simpson (Aug 02)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 Dave Taht (Aug 02)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 William Allen Simpson (Aug 02)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 Anne Mitchell (Aug 02)
- Re: FEC AO 2022-14 sronan (Aug 01)