nanog mailing list archives
Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions
From: Brie <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:49:58 -0700
On 12/16/22 10:04 AM, ic wrote:
In my experience, threading is done by clients looking for the In-Reply-To: header, not subject. Subject is a heuristic fallback, in case In-Reply-To is absent.
I believe the References: header is what most clients use as well? -- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Abraham Y. Chen (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Jethro Binks (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brielle (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Pim van Stam (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- RE: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Kord Martin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions ic (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions William Herrin (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Joel Esler via NANOG (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Brie (Dec 16)
- Re: 202212160543.AYC Re: eMail Conventions Tom Beecher (Dec 16)