nanog mailing list archives

Re: VPN recommendations?


From: Nathan Angelacos <nangel () tetrasec net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 19:36:50 -0500

On Sat, 2022-02-12 at 13:24 -0700, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
On 2/11/22 12:35 PM, William Herrin wrote:
The thing to understand is that IPSec has two modes: transport and 
tunnel. Transport is between exactly two IP addresses while tunnel 
expects a broader network to exist on at least one end.

That is (syntactically) correct.  However, it is possible to NAT many
LAN IPs (say RFC 1918) to one single Internet IP (say from a SOHO
ISP) 
and use IPSec /Transport/ Mode to a single remote IP.  The IPSec sees
exactly two IPs.

"Tunnel" mode is what everyone actually uses

I may be enough of an outlier that I'm a statistical anomaly.  But
I'm using IPSec /Transport/ Mode between my home router and my VPSs. 
I have a tiny full mesh of IPSec /Transport/ Mode connections.


+1 on *cough* enterprise networks.

Using the aforementioned many-to-one NAT, my home LAN systems access
the single globally routed IP of each of my VPSs without any problem.


+1

Aside:  I did have to tweak MTU for LAN traffic going out to the VPS
IPs.

+1


So -1 for '"Tunnel" mode is what everyone actually uses', and +1 for 
/Transport/ Mode 

+1


Current thread: