nanog mailing list archives
Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging
From: Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe <lb () 6by7 net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:31:59 -0800
Perhaps owning a (small but global) cloud computing & telecom company has spoiled me, but it seems like a trivial amount of resources to me for any moderately sized company let alone a large tech/telecom like anything you’d have heard of. -LB Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO ben () 6by7 net "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks> FCC License KJ6FJJ
On Feb 9, 2022, at 12:15 PM, Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote: Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let the world ping the brains out of it? Seems like a lot of overhead for zero benefit. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:11 PM Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe <lb () 6by7 net <mailto:lb () 6by7 net>> wrote: ok that’s amazing. RFC1149 amazing. Side note, am I missing something obvious where I can’t just have hardware routers strip ICMP, pipe it separately, put 500 VMs behind 4 vLBs and let the world ping the brains out of it? Who owns 69.69.69.69 - collab? How naff is this? -LB Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO ben () 6by7 net <mailto:ben () 6by7 net> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.” ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks> FCC License KJ6FJJOn Feb 9, 2022, at 9:38 AM, Jay Hennigan <jay () west net <mailto:jay () west net>> wrote: On 2/8/22 23:42, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:The only problem is the less friendly IP address (although this will be less and less a problem with IPv6, since 2001:4860:4860::8888 is not really friendly).Fun fact: Someone at Sprint had the same hobby as I did in the early 1970s. Their website resolves to 2600:: which I think is rather friendly. :-) Please don't use it for an IPv6 ping target, thanks. -- Jay Hennigan - jay () west net <mailto:jay () west net> Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
Current thread:
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging, (continued)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Matthew Walster (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Tinka (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Jay Hennigan (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Aaron Wendel (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Jay Hennigan (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Saku Ytti (Feb 09)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 10)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 10)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 10)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 11)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging james.cutler () consultant com (Feb 11)