nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:24:29 -0800
Yo Töma! On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 04:16:49 +0200 Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com> wrote:
(I'm making up figures now, obviously)
When you base decision on imaginary figures, you get suboptimal results.
the SNR of UGC in IPv4 is like 10x times it is in IPv6
My experience, using fail2band, and spamassassin, for over a decade with IPv6, is that 100x more spam and other abuse comes from IPv4, not IPv6.
your management would start asking questions about whether it's really the best time to invest in this rather than in another potential revenue stream.
Now what would your management thinK? Then toss in that IPv6 is faster than IPv4. Dunno why, but easy to prove that for yourself. If you care to experiment, rather than make up figures. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 gem () rellim com Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
Attachment:
_bin
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Smahena Amakran (Jan 27)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 30)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Matt Harris (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Jay Hennigan (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Gary E. Miller (Jan 31)
- Re: Request to participate in 2-min study survey on IPv6 Adoption Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 30)