nanog mailing list archives
Re: Can it really be this quiet?
From: Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 15:02:52 -0500
Q4 of 2021 is over, I think that the list is taking a well-deserved break (if you know what I mean).
Jokes aside, this is the first time I've really seen the NANOG list this quiet which is great news meaning everything is a-OK. Happy New Year everyone, hope you all have a safe one!
Regards, Peter Potvin | Executive Director ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Accuris Technologies Ltd. 11-300 Earl Grey Drive, Suite #124, Kanata, Ontario K2T1C1 Canada Email: peter.potvin () accuristechnologies ca Office: +1 (877) 352-6105 On 2022-01-03 2:52 p.m., Douglas Vought via NANOG wrote:
On 1/3/2022 2:46 PM, Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) wrote:Or has NANOG also succumbed to a signed-integer date problem? Waiting to see what I get back.. ..AllenThe integers are fine. That said, every mailing list I'm in is eerily quiet.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x8FDB92430D85B940.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Current thread:
- Can it really be this quiet? Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Brian Reichert (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Douglas Vought via NANOG (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Peter Potvin via NANOG (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Job Snijders via NANOG (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Josh Luthman (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Brian Knight via NANOG (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Jared Mauch (Jan 03)
- Re: Can it really be this quiet? Josh Luthman (Jan 03)