nanog mailing list archives
RE: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements
From: "tim () pelican org" <tim () pelican org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:07:39 +0100 (BST)
The MX204 is pure shocker! Unless the MX304 will come with a license-based approach to run at MX204 pricing, that is Juniper shooting themselves in the foot.
Unless I'm missing a trick, the MX304 doesn't have an answer to installing DWDM, bidi, or other fancy optics in the SPF+ ports on the MX204. QSFP+ breakout to 4 x 10G is supported, but only 4 x vanilla 1310 optics - you'll need an external OEO solution if you want fancy 10G options. It otherwise seems a nice box on paper, although substantially more expensive than the MX204. Cheers, Tim.
Current thread:
- Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Mark Tinka (Jun 14)
- Re: DMARC ViolationDKIM ViolationSerious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Paschal Masha (Jun 14)
- RE: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements tim () pelican org (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Eric Kuhnke (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Saku Ytti (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Brian (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Eric Kuhnke (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Saku Ytti (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Raymond Burkholder (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Saku Ytti (Jun 14)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Tom Beecher (Jun 17)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: Serious Juniper Hardware EoL Announcements Raymond Burkholder (Jun 14)