nanog mailing list archives

Re: 202203090732.AYC Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:26:10 -0800

 Mr. Chen:

Would you please stop changing the subject line with an added date stamp
every time you post? It fouls threaded email readers and is most
inconsiderate.

In addition, I respectfully encourage you to trim the recipients to just
the mailnig list and the specific individual to whom you are sending a
reply.

Thanks,
Bill Herrin


On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:19 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

Mr. Chen:

Would you please stop changing the subject line with an added date stamp
every time you post? It fouls threaded email readers and is most
inconsiderate.

Thanks,
Bill Herrin


On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:09 AM Abraham Y. Chen <aychen () avinta com> wrote:

Dear John:

1)    Thanks for your comment on how eMail headers could be used.

Dear Bill:

2)    I am glad that you agree that it should be a viable discussion on
making use of the 240/4 netblock, while waiting for IPv6 to deliver its
promises.

3)    As to your question about where does IPv6 stand today and where is
it heading, I like to highlight a recent APNIC blog that you may have read.
It also appeared on CircleID. After a long recount of the history, the
author seems to hint that 1995 may be the new starting point for looking
forward.


https://blog.apnic.net/2022/02/21/another-year-of-the-transition-to-ipv6/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=apnic-blog-weekly-wrap_4



https://circleid.com/posts/20220220-another-year-of-the-transition-to-ipv6

4)    We fully realize that the EzIP approach is quite unorthodox. As
such, we received numerous quick criticisms in the past. With the proposal
now put together, we do hope colleagues on this list will take the time
to review its specifics. I look forward to comments and critiques on its
merits.

Regards,


Abe (2022-03-09 12:08)


Message: 7
Date: 8 Mar 2022 15:32:36 -0500
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com> <johnl () iecc com>
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re:
     202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)
Message-ID: <20220308203237.53E7038B1B83 () ary qy> <20220308203237.53E7038B1B83 () ary qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

It appears that Anne Mitchell <amitchell () isipp com> <amitchell () isipp com> said:

Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> <nanog () nanog org>, Greg Skinner <gregskinner0 () icloud com> <gregskinner0 () 
icloud com>, "Karandikar, Abhay" <Director () iitk ac in> <Director () iitk ac in>, Rama Ati

<rama_ati () outlook com> <rama_ati () outlook com>, Bob Corner GMAIL <bobbiecorner () gmail com> <bobbiecorner () 
gmail com>, "Hsing, T. Russell" <tHsing () ieee org> <tHsing () ieee org>, "Chen, Henry C.J."<hcjchen () avinta com> 
<hcjchen () avinta com>, ST Hsieh <uschinaeetc () gmail com> <uschinaeetc () gmail com>, "Chen, Abraham Y." <AYChen 
() alum mit edu> <AYChen () alum mit edu>

This is a whole lot of cc:s to people who aren't even part of this group/list.  One wonders with this many cc:s, how 
many bcc:s there also were, and to whom.

There are several thousand people on the NANOG list, and public web archives.  I don't think this
is a useful question.

FWIW, I also don't think that repurposing 240/4 is a good idea.  To be useful it would require
that every host on the Internet update its network stack, which would take on the order of
a decade, to free up some space that would likely be depleted in a year or two.  It's basically
the same amount of work as getting everything to work on IPv6.

R's,
John


------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 13:11:58 -0800
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us> <bill () herrin us>
To: John Levine <johnl () iecc com> <johnl () iecc com>
Cc: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org> <nanog () nanog org> <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: CC: s to Non List Members (was Re: 202203080924.AYC Re:
     202203071610.AYC Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock)
Message-ID:
     <CAP-guGVCXC_8H+wgriM=Vv0bqPg4+arw0pXhcQhh7rccrxVxEg () mail gmail com> 
<CAP-guGVCXC_8H+wgriM=Vv0bqPg4+arw0pXhcQhh7rccrxVxEg () mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:34 PM John Levine <johnl () iecc com> <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

FWIW, I also don't think that repurposing 240/4 is a good idea.  To be useful it would require
that every host on the Internet update its network stack,

Hi John,

That's incorrect and obviously so. While repurposing 240/4 as general
purpose Internet addresses might require that level of effort, other
uses such as local LAN addressing would only require the equipment on
that one lan to be updated -- a much more attainable goal.

Reallocating 240/4 as unpurposed unicast address space would allow
some standards-compliant uses to become practical before others. A few
quite quickly.



which would take on the order of
a decade, to free up some space that would likely be depleted in a year or two.  It's basically
the same amount of work as getting everything to work on IPv6.

Is it not past time we admit that we have no real idea what the
schedule or level of effort will be for making IPv6 ubiquitous? This
year it was more than last year and next year it'll probably be more
than this year. The more precise predictions all seem to have fallen
flat.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


--
William Herrinbill@herrin.ushttps://bill.herrin.us/


------------------------------



<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
 Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
<#m_1889185439734392099_m_-9011500040057407468_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>



--
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
<https://bill.herrin.us/>
https://bill.herrin.us/



-- 
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
<https://bill.herrin.us/>
https://bill.herrin.us/

Current thread: