nanog mailing list archives

Re: are underwater routers a thing?

From: Karl Auer <kauer () biplane com au>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:19:36 +1100

On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 19:59 -0700, H.Shrikumar wrote:

Schroedinger Routers .. now that's what I want to see. Deflection
routing taken to its logical conclusion. But you can never tell if it
worked or not.


Yes, you can. But you can't see if they are *working*. :-)

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer

GPG fingerprint: 61A0 99A9 8823 3A75 871E 5D90 BADB B237 260C 9C58
Old fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170

Current thread:

are underwater routers a thing? Michael Thomas (Mar 17)
- RE: are underwater routers a thing? Jerry Cloe (Mar 17)
  - Re: are underwater routers a thing? Andy Ringsmuth (Mar 17)
  - Re: are underwater routers a thing? John Levine (Mar 17)
    - Re: are underwater routers a thing? Christopher Morrow (Mar 17)
  - Re: are underwater routers a thing? Karl Auer (Mar 17)
    - Re: are underwater routers a thing? Justin Streiner (Mar 17)
  - Re: are underwater routers a thing? H.Shrikumar (Mar 17)
    - Re: are underwater routers a thing? Karl Auer (Mar 17)
- Re: are underwater routers a thing? Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Mar 17)
- Re: are underwater routers a thing? Joel Jaeggli (Mar 17)
- Re: are underwater routers a thing? Ethan O'Toole (Mar 18)