nanog mailing list archives
Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:00:45 -0600
On 3/21/22 11:30 AM, TJ Trout wrote:
We have carefully engineered our apps and VPN servers to categorically eliminate sensitive information. As a result, ExpressVPN can never be compelled to provide customer data that does not exist.
I understand and appreciate your architecture.However, there seems to be one piece of information that you neglected / elided.
What will ExpressVPN do regarding /established/ connections? I would expect that network flows / netstat / etc. could provide some information for current, established, and ongoing.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Andrew G. Watters (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Jay Hennigan (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud TJ Trout (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Josh Luthman (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Matthew Kaufman (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Jay Hennigan (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 21)
- Re: VPN-enabled advance fee fraud Mark Seiden (Mar 21)