Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

[Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>]

I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN
to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in situations like this,
increasing the flow of real information counters the flow of misinformation.

-J

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 7:05 AM John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:

> ICANN response request from the Ukraine regarding various DNS
> interventions –
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-fedorov-02mar22-en.pdf
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
> On 2 Mar 2022, at 1:01 AM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:
>
> Regarding the portion of the request to the RIPE NCC to withdraw the
> relevant Russia registered IP address blocks, it appears that the RIPE NCC
> has reiterated their position on such disputes -
>
>
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/announcements/ripe-ncc-executive-board-resolution-on-provision-of-critical-services
>
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
> On 1 Mar 2022, at 3:25 AM, Ryan Hamel <administrator () rkhtech org> wrote:
>
> It’s already spread to the news -
> https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ukraine-icann-russia-internet-runet-disconnection-1314278/
>
> Ryan
>
> *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces+ryan=rkhtech.org () nanog org> *On Behalf Of *George
> Herbert
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:17 AM
> *To:* Nanog <nanog () nanog org>
> *Subject:* Ukraine request yikes
>
> Posted by Bill Woodcock on Twitter…
> https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21
>
> https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS
>
> Ukraine (I think I read as) want ICANN to turn root nameservers off,
> revoke address delegations, and turn off TLDs for Russia.
>
> Seems… instability creating…
>
>
> -george
> Sent from my iPhone