nanog mailing list archives
Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids
From: Nimrod Levy <nimrodl () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:07:49 -0400
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:35 AM Job Snijders via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
I'd reject them. Why carve out an exception merely because the number is 'large'? :-)
To add to this, many routes does not equal lots of traffic or even important traffic. If it continues to be invalid, someone didn't bother to make sure it works everywhere. Keep dropping them. -- Nimrod
Current thread:
- A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Drew Weaver (Mar 30)
- Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Andrey Kostin (Mar 30)
- Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Jon Lewis (Mar 30)
- Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Job Snijders via NANOG (Mar 30)
- Re: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Nimrod Levy (Mar 30)
- RE: A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids Drew Weaver (Mar 31)