nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
----- On Mar 30, 2022, at 12:36 PM, Jared Brown nanog-isp () mail com wrote:
Randy Carpenter wrote:Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: When your ISP starts charging $X/Month for legacy protocol supportOut of interest, how would this come about?ISPs are facing ever growing costs to continue providing IPv4 services.Could you please be more specific about which costs you are referring to? It's not like IP transit providers care if they deliver IPv4 or IPv6 bits to you.Have you priced blocks of IPv4 addresses lately?IPv4 address blocks have a fixed one-time cost, not an ongoing $X/month cost. - Jared
How, exactly, would you propose a company recoup the cost? -Randy
Current thread:
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported John Levine (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: Bufferbloat and the pandemic was: V6 still not supported Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Mar 24)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Doug McIntyre (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)