nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported
From: John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 18:26:50 -0500
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:47:08 -0700 John Gilmore <gnu () toad com> wrote:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-240/
The draft touches on IANA considerations, but this seems inadequate to make any more progress and gain wider acceptance. It seems to me there has been compelling arguments made about the ability to rx, tx, and relay packets with these addresses, but the real challenge remains, how should they be allocated? The document should probably request that they be changed from reserved to experimental explicitly. Suggesting the IETF/IANA just figure out what to do with them later seems unsatisfying. Perhaps the equivalent of an IAB-style workshop report or position paper that goes into potential allocation choices and effects in detail is worthwhile? I'd imagine you'd get lots of interesting presentations on a possible allocation strategies and challenges if you decide to organize something like this. I'd like to see some options for the IANA/IETF. Let's see someone dissect what if anything RIRs should get and what the effect of different policies for the new blocks might be. Let's hear about some interesting new special-use ideas. I'd love to see someone suggest a spectrum-like auction to the highest bidder and get doused with rotten fruit... etc :-) John
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Brandon Butterworth (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joshua Mallad (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Gilmore (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Justin Streiner (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)