nanog mailing list archives
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:08:11 -0700
On Mar 30, 2022, at 17:00 , Joe Maimon <jmaimon () jmaimon com> wrote: Tom Beecher wrote:If the IETF has really been unable to achieve consensus on properly supporting the currently still dominant internet protocol, that is seriously problematic and a huge process failure. That is not an accurate statement. The IETF has achieved consensus on this topic. It's explained here by Brian Carpenter. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/qWaHXBKT8BOx208SbwWILDXyAUA/As I have explained with my newly introduced consensus standards, there is no such consensus. To reiterate my consensus standards, consensus is only to be considered as amongst stakeholders and IPv6 specific related stakes are not relevant to IPv4. If you consider the reverse to be true as well, I think my version of consensus would achieve a much wider and diverse consensus than the the stated IETF's consensus. Once a consensus has been proven invalid its beyond obnoxious to cling to it as though it maintains its own reality field.
Yes, but you don’t have consensus for your new consensus standard, so… Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC, (continued)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Justin Streiner (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 27)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 29)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Tom Beecher (Mar 30)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Mar 31)
- RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Matthew Petach (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Joe Maimon (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 28)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 26)
- Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 26)