nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: "Livingood, Jason via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 12:41:41 +0000
This is going to be very painful and difficult for a number of DOCSIS3 operators, including some of the largest ISPs in the USA with multi-millions of subscribers with tons of legacy coax plant that have no intention of ever changing the RF channel setup and downstream/upstream asymmetric bandwidth allocation to provide more than 15-20Mbps upstream per home.
All the large DOCSIS networks of which I am aware are in fact working on changing their spectrum plan and physical layer to enable higher US speeds and in some cases symmetric multi-gig services. JL
Current thread:
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Aaron Wendel (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jeff Shultz (May 26)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers tim () pelican org (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Eric Kuhnke (May 29)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 30)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers John Levine (May 30)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jared Mauch (May 31)