nanog mailing list archives
Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements
From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 10:20:54 -0400
It's very important to specify the /24 inside the /23 for example so as you said "for all our subnets being advertised". On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:01 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Thanks everyone for your inputs. So bottomline setup RPKI and setup ROA's for all our subnets being advertised.if the BGP advertisements are correct, then mirror them in ROAs. most, if not all, CA UIs make that easy. randy
Current thread:
- Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Samuel Jackson (Nov 01)
- RE: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Kevin Burke (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Alex Band (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Jon Lewis (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements heasley (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Samuel Jackson (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Josh Luthman (Nov 02)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Jon Lewis (Nov 01)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements heasley (Nov 02)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 02)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements jim deleskie (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Nov 03)
- Re: Understanding impact of RPKI and ROA on existing advertisements Randy Bush (Nov 03)