nanog mailing list archives
Re: [External] Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)
From: Hunter Fuller via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 01:39:25 -0500
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:29 AM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
1. Do I really have to “de-aggregate” the address blocks, so I can do the “manual BGP load-sharing”?
Why not prepend toward the commercial ISP? Seems that should make the path longer and less desirable. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering
Current thread:
- Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG (Oct 18)
- Re: [External] Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Oct 18)
- Re: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) William Herrin (Oct 18)
- RE: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) Kevin Burke (Oct 19)
- Re: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) Jay Hennigan (Oct 19)
- Re: Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams) Douglas Fischer (Oct 19)