nanog mailing list archives
Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:25:27 +0200
Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf () gmail com> writes:
Looking at the fix, Donald has only removed IPV4_CLASS_DE(a) ((((uint32_t)(a)) & 0xe0000000) == 0xe0000000) validation but kept INADDR_ANY. I’ll bring up RFC6286 to him
I believe it is implementing the RFC6286 requirements. INADDR_ANY is ((in_addr_t) 0x00000000), which is the only illegal value. Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only, (continued)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Crist Clark (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Saku Ytti (Sep 09)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Jeff Tantsura (Sep 12)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 12)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Jeff Tantsura (Sep 13)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Bjørn Mork (Sep 13)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only heasley (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Randy Bush (Sep 08)
- Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only Tom Beecher (Sep 08)