Re: sigs wanted for a response to the fcc's NOI for faster broadband speeds

[Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>]

Trying to put technical requirements like this into law and public policy
is an extremely terrible idea. This letter should never be sent.

The regulatory agencies today don't have the manpower or expertise to
adequately enforce the more generic broadband deployment rules. What
fantasy world exists where they have the manpower or expertise to monitor
for and enforce something like this? Hell, there are constant , legitimate
technical discussions between experts on HOW to *properly* monitor things
just like this. We want to have someone at the FCC deciding what that
should look like?

4.4 What the hell? The regulatory agencies should be allocating spectrum,
and making sure it's not used improperly with the rules of allocation.
Making it work 'better' is OUR job in the technical community. Not an FCC
rulemaker.

4.8 There are zero scenarios there should ever be regulatory rules about
device software. In our space (non-ISP) , TONS of people run older versions
of vendor code. Why? The shit DOESN'T WORK RIGHT YET and it causes other
problems. You suggest that regulatory bodies be involved in dictating
anything about this?

The bufferbloat work belongs in the technical area, full stop. Nowhere near
regulatory / legal.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:57 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com> wrote:

> Over here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4vH4/edit
>
> Us bufferbloat folk have been putting together a response to the FCC's
> NOI (notice of inquiry) asking for feedback as to increasing the
> broadband speeds beyond 100/20 Mbit.
>
> "Calls for further bandwidth increases are analogous to calling for
> cars to have top speeds of 100, 200, or 500 miles per hour. Without
> calling also for better airbags, bumpers, brakes, or steering wheels,
> (or roads designed to minimize travel delay), these initiatives will
> fail (and are failing) to meet the needs of present and future users
> of the internet."
>
> Comments (and cites) welcomed also! The text is still somewhat in flux...
>
>
> --
> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos