nanog mailing list archives
Re: SDN Internet Router (sir)
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:17:35 +0900
Matthew Walster wrote:
SDN does not imply QoS routing,
As long as the shortest path is comfortable enough, no, it does not have to.
it's just one aspect of it. Some use it for classifying guest traffic etc.
If special path is provided for guest or otherwise prioritized traffic, that's QoS routing. Anyway, prioritization needs more, not less, routing table entries. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mel Beckman (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Tom Beecher (Jan 04)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Christopher Morrow (Jan 04)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 06)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Matthew Walster via NANOG (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 07)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 10)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 10)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Masataka Ohta (Jan 11)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 11)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) John Osmon (Jan 11)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mel Beckman (Jan 03)
- Re: SDN Internet Router (sir) Mike Hammett (Jan 05)