nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1299 capacity constraints
From: Ross Tajvar <ross () tajvar io>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:24:29 -0400
It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location. We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Unfortunately these days, having uncongested path requires paying a lot of attention and distributing your traffic yourself rather than simply handing it off to your transit providers. On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, 7:57 AM Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com> wrote:
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed? Off-list is fine, I am just trying to get a sense of what is going on there. Thanks, -Drew
Current thread:
- 1299 capacity constraints Drew Weaver (Jul 14)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Mark Tinka (Jul 14)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Daniel Marks via NANOG (Jul 14)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Ross Tajvar (Jul 14)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Matthew Petach (Jul 16)
- RE: 1299 capacity constraints Jerry Cloe (Jul 16)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Ross Tajvar (Jul 16)
- RE: 1299 capacity constraints Greg Dickinson (Jul 17)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Matthew Petach (Jul 16)
- Re: 1299 capacity constraints Mark Tinka (Jul 14)