nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:01:12 -0700
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:51 PM Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :)
It's been a while and the article is light on the facts of the case, but IIRC what happened was: RIAA made some DMCA complaints to Cox. Cox decided that since they were the network rather than the host, they couldn't "remove" the offending material, wouldn't cut the user's access and, because they have such respect for customer privacy, wouldn't tell the RIAA who the customers were unless RIAA subpoenaed them under a John Doe suit. The court decided that Cox's behavior was sufficient to waive the DMCA's liability shield for Internet providers and off they went to trial. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Michael Thomas (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Terrence de Kat (Jun 03)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Mel Beckman (Jun 03)
- RE: Are we back to the 2000's again? Brian Turnbow via NANOG (Jun 05)
- Re: Are we back to the 2000's again? Terrence de Kat (Jun 03)