nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR)
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:51:07 -0700
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400G and future 800G optics as those use breakout to support 100G ports. Would you rather do a 400G port on a router vs 100LR1? Curious what others think.
We use a lot of 100g-FR For dense deployment and limited faceplate space, 100g-fr / dr are the only way. LR4 is dead to me.
Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
Current thread:
- 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Jared Mauch (Mar 31)
- Re: 100G-LR1 (DR/FR) Ca By (Mar 31)