nanog mailing list archives
Re: A blatant podcast plug
From: Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:19:02 -0800
On 3/6/23 15:50, Matt Corallo wrote:
To clarify, since it was pointed out sat links *are* important to support, I really should have said earth-mars links here. 30 seconds isn't a realistic sat link latency either these days, let alone jitter :). Honestly I'm not really sure where you could even find 30 seconds of jitter anywhere, but, hey the constant literally came from RFC 791 and we can't change that now, apparently.
RFC1149 has entered the chat. -- Jay Hennigan - jay () west net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
Current thread:
- A blatant podcast plug Dave Taht (Mar 05)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Alexander Huynh via NANOG (Mar 05)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Dave Taht (Mar 10)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Matt Corallo (Mar 05)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Matt Corallo (Mar 06)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Jay Hennigan (Mar 06)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Matt Corallo (Mar 06)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Mark Tinka (Mar 06)
- Re: A blatant podcast plug Alexander Huynh via NANOG (Mar 05)