nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing?

From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 12:39:57 -0800

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 12:27 PM Aaron1 <aaron1 () gvtc com> wrote:

Sounds like something uRPF would prevent

Does anyone do uRPF ?  lol


I would hope folks are implementing uRPF on commodity broadband
connections. That's one place it works great.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/

Current thread:

Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? John Levine (Mar 09)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Aaron1 (Mar 09)
  - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
    - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Jon Lewis (Mar 09)
    - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
  - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Mark Tinka (Mar 12)
- Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Munz-Michielin (Mar 09)
  - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Christopher Morrow (Mar 09)
  - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 09)
    - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)
    - Re: Is malicious asymmetrical routing still a thing? William Herrin (Mar 09)