nanog mailing list archives
Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service
From: Allan Liska <allan () allan vin>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 22:09:52 +0000
I think it is a matter of proportionality. According to Spamhaus malicious domains account for only 1.5% of all .com domains, but 4.8% of all .us domains (https://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/tlds/) - compare that to .tk where 6.7% of all domains are malicious. allan ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, November 2nd, 2023 at 4:46 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM goemon--- via NANOG nanog () nanog org wrote:https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/us-harbors-prolific-malicious-link-shortening-service/ What hope is there when registrars are actively aiding and abeting criminal enterprises?I'm confused. Does .com/.net/.org have a different/better vulnerability profile to these third party link shorteners? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service goemon--- via NANOG (Nov 02)
- RE: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Shawn L via NANOG (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service William Herrin (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Allan Liska (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service William Herrin (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service bzs (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Rubens Kuhl (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Allan Liska (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Richard Holbo (Nov 02)
- Re: .US Harbors Prolific Malicious Link Shortening Service Eric Kuhnke (Nov 02)