nanog mailing list archives
Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting?
From: Matt Corallo <nanog () as397444 net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 11:32:17 -0800
On 11/8/23 2:23 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 11/8/23 2:25 PM, owen () Delong com wrote:Seems irresponsible to me that a root-server (or other critical DNS provider) would engage in a peering war to the exclusion of workable DNS.I've brought this up before and the root servers are not really an IANA function IIRC. There's not much governance over them, other than what's on root-servers.org. I think a case could be made that C is in violation of the polices on that page and RFC 7720 section 3.Basically none of the root servers want to change this and thus it's never going to change. DNS will fail and select another to talk to, and things will still work.
At what point does HE just host a second C root and announce the same IPv6s? Might irritate Cogent, but its not more "bad" than Cogent failing to uphold the requirements for running a root server.
Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Matthew Pounsett (Nov 10)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Mark Andrews (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? owen--- via NANOG (Nov 10)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Bryan Fields (Nov 10)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Matt Corallo (Nov 13)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Ryan Hamel (Nov 13)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Matt Corallo (Nov 13)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Matt Corallo (Nov 13)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Giorgio Bonfiglio via NANOG (Nov 14)
- Re: Am I the only one who thinks this is disconcerting? Bryan Fields (Nov 10)