nanog mailing list archives

Re: MX204 tunnel services BW

From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 06:39:23 +0200



On 10/16/23 21:49, Jeff Behrns via NANOG wrote:

Also leaving tunnel-services bandwidth unspecified is not possible on the 204.


This is true of other MX platforms as well, unless I misunderstand.

Mark.

Current thread:

Re: MX204 tunnel services BW, (continued)
- - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Tom Beecher (Oct 03)
  - RE: MX204 tunnel services BW Jeff Behrns via NANOG (Oct 03)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 03)
- Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Saku Ytti (Oct 02)
  - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 03)
  - RE: MX204 tunnel services BW Jeff Behrns via NANOG (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Delong.com via NANOG (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Saku Ytti (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Ryan Kozak (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Mark Tinka (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Mark Tinka (Oct 16)
    - Re: MX204 tunnel services BW Saku Ytti (Oct 16)