nanog mailing list archives
Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ?
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 13:05:54 -0400
And is it your belief that this addresses the described attack vector? AFAICT, it does not.
Quoting myself : WITH the assertion that all routers in the routing domain are RPKI enabled,
and discarding RPKI INVALIDs.
In the mixed RPKI / non-RPKI environment of today's internet, no it doesn't. This does not mean that RPKI is deficient, or the AS 0 ROA doesn't work as intended, as was stated. On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 12:57 PM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 9:38 AM Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc> wrote:He's saying that someone could come along and advertise 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 and by doing so they'd hijack every unrouted address block regardless of the block's ROA. RPKI is unable to address this attack vector.https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6483 Section 4A ROA with a subject of AS 0 (AS 0 ROA) is an attestation by the holder of a prefix that the prefix described in the ROA, and any more specific prefix, should not be used in a routing context.And is it your belief that this addresses the described attack vector? AFAICT, it does not. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV, (continued)
- Re: Acceptance of RPKI unknown in ROV Dale W. Carder (Oct 20)
- RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Amir Herzberg (Oct 21)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Mark Tinka (Oct 21)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? William Herrin (Oct 21)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Amir Herzberg (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Tom Beecher (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Tom Beecher (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Tom Beecher (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Tom Beecher (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Amir Herzberg (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Tom Beecher (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 24)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 24)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ? Mark Tinka (Oct 21)