Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

[Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>]

On 02/10/2023 19:24, Matthew Petach wrote:

> The problem with this approach is you now have non-deterministic routing.
>
> Depending on the state of FIB compression, packets *may* flow out 
> interfaces that are not what the RIB thinks they will be.
> This can be a good recipe for routing micro-loops that come and go as 
> your FIB compression size ebbs and flows.

Had NOT considered the looping - that's what you get for writing in 
public without thinking it all the way through *blush*.

Thanks for poking holes appropriately,
Tim.