nanog mailing list archives
Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:39:43 +0100
Bjørn Mork wrote on 01/09/2023 08:17:
Sounds familiar. https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/BGP-Malformed-AS-4-Byte-Transitive-Attributes-Drop-BGP-Sessions?language=en_US You'd think a lot of thought has gone into error handling for optional transitive attributes since then, but...
A good deal of thought has gone into the problem, and this is where rfc7606 came from. Treat-as-withdraw for the NLRI in question is the default option with this approach, and should be deployed universally.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Bjørn Mork (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Nick Hilliard (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Bjørn Mork (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Eugeniu Patrascu (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Bjørn Mork (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Nick Hilliard (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Job Snijders via NANOG (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Bjørn Mork (Sep 01)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Tom Beecher (Sep 05)
- Re: JunOS/FRR/Nokia et al BGP critical issue Nick Hilliard (Sep 01)