nanog mailing list archives
Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 10:48:45 -0700
About 60% of the table is /24 routes. Just going to /25 will probably double the table size.
or maybe just add 60%, not 100%. and it would take time. agree it would be quite painful. would rather not go there. sad to say, i suspect some degree of lengthening is inevitable. we have ourselves to blame; but blame does not move packets. randy, who was in the danvers cabal for the /19 agreement
Current thread:
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?, (continued)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? William Herrin (Sep 28)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Elmar K. Bins (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Tom Beecher (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Saku Ytti (Sep 29)
- ODP: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Marcin Gondek (Sep 28)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Randy Bush (Sep 30)