nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 08:12:51 +0200
On 9/7/23 09:31, Benny Lyne Amorsen wrote:
Unfortunately that is not strict round-robin load balancing.
Oh? What is it then, if it's not spraying successive packets across member links?
I do not know about any equipment that offers actual round-robin load-balancing.
Cisco had both per-destination and per-packet. Is that not it in the networking world?
Juniper's solution will cause way too much packet reordering for TCP to handle. I am arguing that strict round-robin load balancing will function better than hash-based in a lot of real-world scenarios.
Ummh, no, it won't. If it did, it would have been widespread. But it's not. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?, (continued)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Tom Beecher (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? David Bass (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Fred Baker (Sep 08)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Benny Lyne Amorsen (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 07)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Benny Lyne Amorsen (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Dave Cohen (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 10)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 06)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 06)