nanog mailing list archives

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake


From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:15:19 -0500

mdns can still be "fun" in a wide variety of situations.

https://www.reddit.com/r/k12sysadmin/comments/9yghdx/chromebooks_and_peer_to_peer_updates_can_be/

I do not know to what extent the upgrade to unicast feature long
gestating in the IETF has been adopted.

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:10 AM Hunter Fuller via NANOG
<nanog () nanog org> wrote:

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:17 AM William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
There's also the double-ISP loss scenario that causes Joe to lose all
global-scope IP addresses. He can overcome that by deploying ULA
addresses (a third set of IPv6 addresses) on the internal hosts, but
convincing the internal network protocols to stay on the ULA addresses
is wonky too.

In the real world today, most applications seem to use mDNS and
link-local addresses to keep this connectivity working. (I am guessing
Joe's Taco Shop uses something like Square, and just needs his
register to talk to his printer. This already works with mDNS and
link-locals today.)

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering



-- 
40 years of net history, a couple songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos


Current thread: