nanog mailing list archives
Re: starlink ixp peering progress
From: Warren Kumari <warren () kumari net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:19:20 -0500
Or this: https://bgp.tools/as/14593#peers Personally I find bgp.tools to be the friendliest… I realize that this thread is turning into an <aol>Me too!</aol> type thread, but it does seem useful to share which tools work best for each of us… W On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:33 AM, Marco Davids <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
Or this? https://bgp.he.net/AS14593#_peers6 Op 27/02/2024 om 13:17 schreef borg () uu3 net: Well, for some basic overview you can use CAIDA AS rank. You can use it directly, or you may try my (more user friendly) frontend for it: http://as-rank.uu3.net/?as=14593 ---------- Original message ---------- From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com> To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org> Subject: starlink ixp peering progress Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:54:44 -0500 One of the things I learned today was that starlink has published an extensive guide as to how existing BGP AS holders can peer with them to get better service. https://starlink-enterprise-guide.readme.io/docs/peering-with-starlink I am curious if there is a way to see how many have peered already, how many they could actually peer with?, and progress over time since inception.... what would be the right tools for that? This is pretty impressive for peering so far: https://www.peeringdb.com/net/18747 Is there a better email list to discuss ixp stuff? -- Marco
Current thread:
- starlink ixp peering progress Dave Taht (Feb 26)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress borg (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Warren Kumari (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Mike Hammett (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Bill Woodcock (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress Bill Woodcock (Feb 27)
- Re: starlink ixp peering progress borg (Feb 27)